Aidan Kim vs Orel Kimhi Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
Wojtek Kolan
Published on 29 Oct at 04:24 PM UTC
HEAD TO HEAD
A. Kim vs O. Kimhi

USA
1
Win
Played
0
Win

ISR
1
Win
Played
0
Win
Head-to-head: Kim 1 - 0 Kimhi
They have played 2 sets in total, with Aidan Kim winning 2 and Orel Kimhi winning 0. The last match between Aidan Kim and Orel Kimhi was at the M25 Harlingen, 29-10-2025, Round: R1, Surface: Hard, with Aidan Kim getting the victory 6-1 6-1.
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Kim | 1 |
| Kimhi | 0 |
Last 1 H2H Matches:
(R1) M25 Harlingen(10-29-25)
A. Kim vs O. Kimhi H2H Profile
A. Kim vs O. Kimhi Match Preview:
- Aidan Kim has a slight advantage in second serve performance recently, winning 44.16% of points compared to Orel Kimhi's 41.15%.
- Both players demonstrate similar capabilities in winning points on their opponent's second serve: Aidan Kim at 47.16% versus Orel Kimhi's 46.15%.
- How do they differ in first serve returns? Aidan Kim wins 25.00%, while Orel Kimhi outperforms at 34.60%.
- Under pressure, Aidan Kim saves 53.28% of breakpoints, slightly more successful than Kimhi's 49.41%.
- Over the past year, Aidan Kim shows stronger match performance with a 65.22% win rate, while Orel Kimhi's is lower at 44.00%.
- Hard courts are the best surface for both, each winning 63% of matches. However, both struggle on their worst surfaces: Grass for Kim and Indoor Hard for Kimhi.
- Aidan Kim has been more successful in lower-tier competitions than Kimhi, winning 75.00% of $10K level matches compared to Kimhi's 44.44%.
- The level of competition faced over the past year is slightly higher for Kim, against opponents with an average rank of 428.09 versus Kimhi's 442.88.
- In deciding set scenarios, Kimhi has a slight edge, winning 60% of his matches, compared to Kim's 50%.
- Event-specific performance could sway predictions, so current event stats should also be considered, if available.
Editorial Prediction (October 29, 2025, UTC):
Analyzing recent performance, Aidan Kim appears to have the upper hand with a stronger second serve and higher breakpoint save percentage. His slight edge in crucial pressure situations suggests a capability to perform better under match stress.
While both players are adept on hard courts and have similar success rates on this surface, Kimhi’s advantage in first serve returns might become a crucial factor depending on the match dynamics. However, Kim's overall superior winning percentage and success in lower-tier tournaments lend him an edge in match play consistency.
In deciding sets, Kimhi has a marginally better win percentage, indicating a higher resilience in tight matches. Nevertheless, Kim's stronger performance against slightly higher-ranked opponents suggests he might be more adept at handling competitive pressures.
Balancing all factors, including past performances and surface preferences, Aidan Kim seems more likely to emerge victorious in this matchup.
Aidan Kim vs Orel Kimhi Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
A. Kim vs O. Kimhi H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches Won | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 12 | Games Won | 2 |
| 4 | Aces (Total) | 0 |
| 1 | Total Double Faults | 2 |
| 1:15:9 | Average Match Time | 1:15:9 |
| 73% (30/41) | 1st Serve % | 75% (43/57) |
| 73% (22/30) | 1st Serve Win % | 42% (18/43) |
| 55% (6/11) | 2nd Serve Win % | 36% (5/14) |
| 50% (6/12) | Break Pts Won % | 50% (1/2) |
| 60% (34/57) | Return Points Win % | 32% (13/41) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/1) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/1) |
Recent Performance Stats
A. Kim Recent Matches Played
O. Kimhi Recent Matches Played

A. Kim vs O. Kimhi Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 58.04% (65/47) | YTD Win/Loss | 52.33% (90/82) |
| 57.79% (152/111) | Sets Win/Loss | 49.36% (194/199) |
| 52.50% (1322/1196) | Games Win/Loss | 50.17% (1801/1789) |
| 62.71% (37/22) | Hard Win/Loss | 54.55% (90/75) |
| 56.67% (17/13) | Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) |
| 50.00% (11/11) | Indoor Hard W/L | 0.00% (0/7) |
| 0.00% (0/1) | Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) |
| 0.39 | Aces Per Game | 0.1 |
| 483 | Aces Total | 183 |
| 0.23 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.16 |
| 283 | Total Double Faults | 280 |
| 1:35:3 | Average Match Time | 1:53:37 |
| 450.19 | Average Opponent Rank | 486.97 |
| 63% (4363/6958) | 1st Serve % | 67% (7384/10940) |
| 68% (2975/4363) | 1st Serve Win % | 61% (4479/7384) |
| 50% (1294/2595) | 2nd Serve Win % | 49% (1743/3556) |
| 43% (303/707) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 47% (598/1277) |
| 41% (2783/6870) | Return Points Win % | 44% (4889/11182) |
| 0% (0/0) | Cups W/L | 0.00% (0/3) |
| 27.27% (3/8) | Challenger W/L | 44.44% (4/5) |
| 61.39% (62/39) | Futures W/L | 53.75% (86/74) |
| 59% (65/110) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 51% (87/169) |
| 0% (0/2) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 100% (2/2) |
| 64% (18/28) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 49% (20/41) |
| 49% (18/37) | Deciding Set Win % | 69% (33/48) |
| 86% (66/57) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 90% (80/72) |
| 14% (66/9) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 10% (80/8) |
| 20% (46/9) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 18% (92/17) |